Hello everyone, I'm Si Shu ~ As an interaction designer, I inevitably have to discuss design plans with products, UI, and the boss at work. During this process, I observed a very interesting phenomenon in myself: The more design logic I consider executive email list obvious, the harder it is to give a convincing design rationale. So why is this the case? The design that can't tell the reason is really because the designer didn't think clearly. Is it a problem of the design itself? Or are some design logics really difficult to convince in words? As designers, how can executive email list we break through our intuition and express it fluently? Around the above problems, I combined some scenarios in my work, made some simple analysis and provided some actionable methods. If you have encountered a similar dilemma and even began to doubt your own plan, then perhaps this article I can unravel this fog for you. 1.
Common Scenarios In the daily work of designers, what are the obvious design logics that are often encountered, but it is difficult to give design executive email list reasons? Take my own recent work as an example, let me give you a simple example: The following figure is a subsidy rule setting process. Before the user has set the subsidy rule, the user is executive email list clearly informed that the subsidy rule has not been set. After the user has set the subsidy rule, the subsidy rule can be modified. I think this is a very simple and reasonable page path jump, and there are similar logic in many existing products.
However, in the process of connecting with upstream and downstream students, they encountered different opinions: some people think that it executive email list is not necessary to distinguish whether users have set rules or not, users can directly display the default subsidy conditions and subsidy scope of the system without setting rules, if users think executive email list it is unreasonable , modify it yourself. I don't know how you feel when you see this. My reaction when I heard "Plan 2" was: I can understand it but I don't agree with it. I can't tell what's wrong. The above is a very specific case that happened in my work. 2. Is intuition really less reliable than reasoning? So why do I have such strong feelings of "feeling something is not right, but can't tell.